About Us

Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, employment HOST: Federal staff members have until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand employment in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to take leave and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it a lot an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very deceptive term to utilize in this circumstance. When you think about a buyout, there’s normally some sort of written arrangement or a concrete deal to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no warranties consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, employment and you are basically offering up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than intended can have severe effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t desire to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for employment 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work actually difficult to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes because there are no assurances. And these are individuals who enjoy their task. They like the objective of the agency. They work hard. And today, employment they’re dealing with really tough options, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: employment You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not mindful of any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to offer this variety of leave. So I believe it is quite potentially setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site regards to usage and consents pages at www.npr.org for employment more info.

NPR records are created on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not be in its last form and might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.