I Medconsults

About Us

2025 uS Executive Orders, DEI, and Employment: how In-house Lawyers can Assist the Business

Remind me, what’s an executive order?

Executive orders are directives ordered by the president of the United States that direct government companies and officials to take specific actions. While they are not laws, they have the force of law and impact how existing laws are implemented or imposed.

Executive orders impact the firms of the executive branch and therefore do not need the approval of Congress. They should be within the president’s constitutional authority and may be challenged in court if considered unconstitutional.

Executive orders may be rescinded, reversed by future presidents, or challenged in court, and enforcement concerns can change during any administration.

The brand-new administration’s actions have significant impacts beyond executive orders. For more on mitigating threat, international businesses can seize new opportunities by remaining active.

Implications of the executive orders for DEI efforts and employment in private-sector organizations

On Jan. 21, President Trump issued « Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity, » which reverses various previous executive orders and memoranda, including Executive Order 11246 (EO 11246) signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. .

EO 11246 required every government agreement to include a declaration that the professional will not victimize any worker or candidate for work based on race, creed, color, or national origin.

Despite President Trump’s new executive order, the underlying federal anti-discrimination law stays unchanged for private-sector employees.

However, the executive order signals that there may be altering enforcement priorities in the brand-new administration. The order directs all federal firms to « combat unlawful private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities. »

In December 2024, President-elect Trump tapped Harmeet K. Dhillon to lead the Justice Department’s civil rights workplace, indicating his record of « taking legal action against corporations who utilize ‘woke’ policies to discriminate against their employees. »

In addition to revoking EO 11246, the Jan. 21 executive order instructs each agency of the federal government to recognize « as much as nine prospective civic compliance examinations » of private sector entities within 120 days of the order – by May 21, 2025.

The personal sector entities subject to these investigations consist of publicly traded corporations, big nonprofits – including bar associations – large structures, and universities whose endowments go beyond US$ 1 billion.

Organizations that may be targeted should ask:

– What is my organization’s danger tolerance?

– How will staff members respond to the business’s actions?

– How will customers and stakeholders respond?

What in-house counsel must consider:

Assess any federal contracts and grants

– Determine if they contain any terms or conditions related to DEI that might conflict with present laws and employment guidelines

Review your organization’s existing DEI policies to comprehend your threat

– Get ready for increased analysis and prospective civil compliance examinations

Document, file, file

– Hiring and recruitment processes

– Performance examinations and promotion choices

– Training products and presence records

– Any changes to DEI policies

Implications for federal professionals

To name a few steps, the Jan. 21 Executive Order requires the heads of federal agencies to consist of particular terms in every agreement or grant award:

– « A term requiring the legal counterparty or grant recipient to concur that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for functions of section 3729( b)( 4) of title 31, United States Code »; and

– « A term needing such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any relevant Federal anti-discrimination laws. »

Section 3729 of title 31 of the United States Code is an arrangement of the US False Claims Act, a federal law that enforces civil charges on those who make incorrect claims to the federal government in order to influence the payment or receipt of cash or residential or commercial property.

The accreditation requirement carries a potential threat of lawsuits for federal contractors under the False Claims Act. In-house lawyers at federal specialists therefore have a particular interest in ensuring their company’s policies, treatments, practices, communications and content, are reviewed. Assess if changes are needed to reduce the threat of lawsuits.

Executive orders targeting illegal migration

President Trump’s initial flurry of executive orders included many – such as the Jan. 20 executive order « Protecting the American People Against Invasion » – intended at limiting illegal immigration and deporting illegal immigrants. The orders call for enforcement actions by federal agencies versus illegal migration.

In-house legal representatives need to consider evaluating their organization’s employment eligibility verification procedure. They may likewise desire to think about whether the company is prepared for reacting to an I-9 audit or a worksite enforcement action (or raid) by immigration enforcement agencies.

Sectors that might be particularly affected consist of agriculture, hospitality, and other industries such as construction. From 2020-2022, 42 percent of crop farmworkers held no work authorization, according to the US Department of Agriculture. The American Immigration Council approximates that more than one million undocumented immigrants work in hospitality, representing 7.1 percent of the labor force.

In-house counsel have an essential role to play in developing and employment making sure constant application of the Form I-9 and E-Verify regulations the federal government utilizes to carry out and impose migration law, shares John W. Mazzeo, AGC, director of I-9 and E-Verify compliance for Vertical Screen, Inc., in a 2024 ACC Docket short article.

Have a look at helpful lists of considerations appropriate for in-house attorneys on the topic of I-9 audits and worksite enforcement actions.

If an employer does not work together with a civil administrative warrant provided by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), there is a risk that the company could commence an I-9 audit if they felt an employer was blocking their need to arrest a non-citizen employee, or in some cases acquire a criminal warrant from a judge if actions support it.

Steps internal counsel need to think about:

– Determine the number of staff members could possibly be impacted

– Review your organization’s work eligibility confirmation process

– Ensure your organization’s procedure is recorded and defensible

– Implement and impose clear policies

– Monitor legal advancements, including litigation and enforcement guidance

Mitigate threat, remain nimble, and employment seize new chances

The current executive orders will significantly affect worldwide companies. Legal departments and internal counsel will require to assist their companies understand and adjust to changes, making sure compliance or litigating when appropriate.

A number of the new administration’s decisions will play out over the coming months, consisting of new executive orders and legal challenges. The Docket will continue to keep an eye on advancements. Global internal legal representatives should prepare for rapid advancements connected to:

Trade and tariffs. On Feb. 1, President Trump ordered the imposition of a 25-percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10-percent extra tariffs on imports from China. The former 2 were both delayed by a month as the administration participates in settlements. Meanwhile, China has started its own retaliatory steps on US products. He had previously announced his intent to enforce 25-percent escalating tariffs on Colombia (an action that was ultimately not taken).

Technology and copyright. One of the president’s very first actions was to rescind the previous administration’s AI executive order. The brand-new administration also extended a grace period for TikTok’s upcoming restriction, sending waves throughout the technology sector, both in the United States and abroad.

Energy, climate, and health. The president also withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization, putting an early focus on American energy independence and far from the previous administration’s global sustainability efforts.

Steps in-house counsel should consider:

– Assess the impact of possible tariff boosts on supply chain and organization connection.

– Assess the company’s reliance on social media platforms, such as for marketing functions, and the prospective needs to backup social networks information and employment properties in case their preferred platform ceases to be offered.

– Consider how advancements in the brand-new administration’s approach to ecological, sustainability and governance issues might affect the company’s ESG technique.

Disclaimer: The details in any resource in this website need to not be construed as legal recommendations or as a legal opinion on particular truths, and ought to not be thought about representing the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a conclusive declaration on the subject resolved. Rather, they are intended to act as a tool supplying useful assistance and references for the busy internal specialist and other readers.